Taiwanese wood-fired ceramics
Simplified 台湾柴烧Also written 柴燒 · 台灣柴燒
Taiwanese chaishao teaware is made through wood firing, which can leave ash deposits and flame markings on the surface. The term describes a firing practice, not a single clay. Contemporary studio work should be distinguished from the longer history of wood-fired pottery in Taiwan.
On this page
Glazes#
| Glaze | 中文 | Description | Sources |
|---|---|---|---|
| Natural ash glaze | 落灰釉 | Wood ash carried through the kiln settles on bare clay and melts into a glassy layer during a long, hot firing. The Hanbao pieces showed reddish-brown bodies, iron spots and ash from yellow to dark green. | 1 |
Methods#
With tea#
Periods#
- 1960s – mid-1980sThe Hanbao kiln, built in partnership with a Japanese potter, made Japanese-taste ware for export and local vases; in the 1970s artists visited or sent work to be fired there.1
- 1981 – mid-1980sAn academic paper dates the Hanbao kiln to 1981 and says it fired vases, tea wares and daily ware.2
- 1980s – presentKilns and potters multiplied; a Taiwanese wood-firing research society (台灣柴燒研究會) was founded.1
- 2016 – presentMiaoli's ceramics festival, from 2016, became an international wood-firing and ceramics expo in 2024, with a wood-fired category.5
Kiln sites#
Heritage listings#
2002
Miaoli County historic building (歷史建築)6
- Site
- 竹南蛇窯 Zhunan snake kiln
The report calls it the origin of Zhunan's wood-firing tradition.
Sources#
Status and editorial notes draft
Sources are listed below. Their presence does not certify every claim; source-specific interpretations and unresolved questions are identified in the text. This page has not received independent expert approval.
- Draft: written 2026-11-02 for the Taiwan batch. Most sources were read through a summarising web fetch on 2026-11-02, so check exact wording against the originals before quoting. Two of the sources are written by kiln operators. Hanbao date conflicts (1960s vs 1981). Wood-fired teapots: no source yet; a Japanese influence (anagama) is implied but not stated, so no cross_tradition link to a jp ware is made. Living potters named in sources are left out (Phase 2). The id is a description, not an established name; rename if os prefers.
Exact supporting passages for the quantitative material claims and historical attributions still require checking against the cited publications.