霜降Frost's Descent
如何读懂茶名

How to read a tea name

A Chinese tea name stacks place, plant, process, grade, year and batch. Learn which parts a buyer can check and which are only claims.

sourced

The parts of a name#

A Chinese tea title is built from a small set of parts, usually in this order: year, maker or brand, place, plant, process, grade, format and weight, and, for factory pu'er, recipe code and batch. A full domestic listing might read 2025年 武夷山 正岩 牛栏坑 肉桂 足火 特级 125g, or 大益 7542 2201批 357g 生茶. Western shops translate some parts, drop others and often add a house name that carries no origin information at all.

Each part answers a different question. Place says where the leaf grew, and in Chinese trade talk the growing site, 山场 (shānchǎng), is treated as the main driver of yancha price. Plant names the cultivar or the age of the bushes or trees. Process names the style: raw or ripe pu'er, roast level for yancha. Grade places the tea on a scale defined by a product standard. Year and batch fix the production.

The parts are not equally reliable. Some are printed facts that a regulator expects to see and a buyer can cross-check. Others are trade vocabulary with no legal meaning, chosen because they raise the price. Reading a name well means sorting each word into one of those two piles before you look at the price.

12

Key facts#

Label must show
name, net content, producer, production date, licence number, standard code (GB 7718-2011 4.1.1)
3
Licence code
SC + 14 digits: food category, province, city, district, serial, check digit
4
Niulankeng output
core gardens 20–30 mu, about 500 kg a year, against hundreds of listings
5
Lao Banzhang output
estimates of 60–117 t a year, depending on who counts and what
6
7542 decoded
75 = recipe year 1975, 4 = leaf grade, 2 = Menghai factory
78
Batch 2201
2022, first production run of the year
29

What the label has to say#

For domestically produced prepackaged tea sold in Mainland China, read the required label separately from the advertising title. Under GB 7718-2011, relevant particulars include the food name, ingredients, net quantity, responsible producer details, production date, shelf life, storage instructions, production licence and applied product standard. Grade labelling depends on the applicable standard. Imported products and other sales formats have different provisions; this is not a checklist for every tea transaction.

SC identifies a food-production licence. Its fourteen digits encode food category, administrative divisions, a sequence and a check digit. Check the official licence record, production address, authorized food category and validity. The number is not a certificate for a named garden, tree age or cultivar. Distinguish the seller or brand owner from the producer named in the record.

The production date concerns completion of the final sale unit and includes packaging or filling; it is not necessarily the harvest date. Ask separately for harvest, processing, pressing and packing dates when those differences matter. Re-roasting or repacking should not be treated as blanket permission to reset dates or shelf life.

GB 7718-2025 takes effect on 16 March 2027. A future rule is not automatically the rule that governed an older wrapper. Read the edition and transition provisions before judging a historical pack.

3410111213141516

Place words: the most valuable and the least checkable#

Place names are nested, and each level costs more. For yancha: 武夷山 (Wǔyíshān), the legal geographical-indication area covering the whole county-level city; then the trade tiers 正岩 (zhèngyán, "true rock"), 半岩 (bànyán) and 洲茶 (zhōuchá); then a named valley such as Niulankeng 牛栏坑 or Matouyan 马头岩. Only the first level is defined in law. The tiers are trade conventions, and the 2026 standard grades yancha by quality alone, without regard to them.

Scarcity is easy to quantify. The Paper reported Niulankeng's core gardens at 20 to 30 mu (about 1.3 to 2 ha) yielding a little over 500 kg a year, against hundreds of online "Niulankeng Rougui" products, and documented sub-names such as 牛首, 牛肚 and 牛尾 coined to stretch the name.

Pu'er works the same way: Menghai county, then Bulang mountain, then the village of Lao Banzhang 老班章. "Banzhang" alone often means the wider area, including Xin Banzhang and Lao Man'e. The Bingdao village committee spans five villages that produced 747 t of dry tea in 2023, while core Bingdao Laozhai spring output is put at about 8 t. A name with a smaller place in it is a stronger claim, and it needs stronger evidence.

1718519

Plant, harvest and process words#

Plant-age words are the most inflated part of pu'er names. 古树 (gǔshù, old tree) has a legal meaning only for conservation: Yunnan's 2022 regulation protects tea trees of 100 years or more, and the 2023 survey rules accept a 15 cm trunk diameter as a stand-in for age. Nothing in those texts governs what a seller writes on a wrapper, and no routine test reads tree age from leaf. 大树 (dàshù), 生态茶 (shēngtàichá) and 台地茶 (táidìchá) have no legal definition at all; see old-tree and plantation tea.

Yancha has its own equivalents. 老枞 (lǎocōng, old bush; see lao cong) has no unified age threshold. A cultivar name such as 肉桂 (ròuguì) or 水仙 (shuǐxiān) is meaningful, and the published GB/T 18745-2026, effective from 1 April 2027, defines both as product categories made from those clonal cultivars, but on any given pack it remains the producer's declaration.

Harvest and processing words are partly checkable by taste and appearance. 头春 (tóuchūn, first spring flush), 纯料 (chúnliào, unblended single-origin material) and 单株 (dānzhū, single tree) cannot be verified from the cake. Roast words such as 轻火, 中火 and 足火 (qīnghuǒ, zhōnghuǒ, zúhuǒ: light, medium, full fire) describe something you can taste and see in the dry leaf, and the 2026 standard gives them as time and temperature ranges (see Roasting yancha). 炭焙 (tànbèi, charcoal-roasted) is a process claim that leaves no definitive trace.

202122101223

Worked example: a Wuyi Rougui title#

Take a typical title: 2025年 武夷山 正岩 牛栏坑 肉桂 老枞 足火 炭焙 特级 125g.

Ask what each part claims. Does 2025 mean harvest, final production or listing year? The production date alone does not settle this. 武夷山 names a place; a producer’s licence and address do not trace leaf to 牛栏坑. 正岩 and 老枞 require the seller’s definitions and supporting records.

肉桂 is a cultivar claim: a cinnamon-like aroma may fit it, but tasting is not genetic identification. 足火 describes roast character; 炭焙 additionally claims a heat source. Sensory observation does not prove fuel or the precise firing schedule. 特级 needs the applied standard, category and edition. Net weight 125g can be measured without the packaging.

Use price and tasting to identify questions, not to authenticate a garden. A cheap offer deserves scrutiny; a high price does not verify provenance. Separate documented facts, sensory observations and unresolved claims.

517223121415

Worked example: a Lao Banzhang sheng title#

Now a pu'er title: 2019 老班章 古树 纯料 头春 生茶 357g.

老班章 is the claim that sets the price. Annual output estimates for the village range from 60 to 117 t, depending on who counts and whether small trees and later harvests are included. Arithmetic is the best filter. In 2020, Lao Banzhang maocha sold for roughly ¥6,000–12,000 per kg depending on picking, so the leaf in a genuine 357 g cake costs well over ¥2,000 before pressing, wrapping or margin. A ¥99 "Lao Banzhang" is not one.

古树 and 纯料 are unverifiable, as above. 头春 is unverifiable, and summer leaf is a documented source of cheap "Lao Banzhang". 2019 can be weighed against the wrapper and 内票 (nèipiào, the slip under the wrapper), but small private pressings rarely carry batch codes. Jiemian notes that the name only appeared on wrappers after about 2003, so a "1990s Lao Banzhang" cake is implausible as named. 生茶 (shēngchá, raw) is visible in the leaf and liquor. 357g can be weighed.

Verdict: most of the value sits in the least checkable words. Buy from someone who will name the farmer or the processing house, and judge the tea in the cup.

6242526

Worked example: a Dayi 7542 batch title#

Factory pu'er reverses the picture: 大益 7542 2201批 357g 生茶.

大益 (Dàyì) is the brand of the Menghai Tea Factory, not a place or a grade. 7542 is a 唛号 (màihào, mark number): 75 for the year the recipe was set, 4 for the main leaf grade, 2 for the Menghai factory. TAETEA dates the first 7542 and 7572 cakes to 1975. 2201批 is the 批次 (pīcì, production run): 22 for 2022, 01 for the first run of that year. The year in the title, the batch and the production date printed on the wrapper should all agree; when they do not, the site marks the entry "Worth checking".

Almost everything here is checkable. The factory sells the same production through its own channels, including a TAETEA listing titled "150g 7542 (2201)". Market reference prices for the batch are quoted at Fangcun, and the case packing (42 cakes per 件 for recent 357 g runs) is on record. The open question is whether this cake is genuine, since well-known productions are the ones most often counterfeited.

Two traps remain. The number 7542 has been printed by other factories, and CNNP 7542 is not Menghai 7542. Batches of the same recipe differ, and first runs often trade higher. See 2022 Dayi 7542, batch 2201.

78292725

A name can describe a shape, a place or a plant#

A traditional tea name is not always a compressed version of a modern label. The naming survey in Zhongguo mingchazhi (2000, pp. 2–3) distinguishes names drawn from appearance or flavour, cultivars, landscapes, cultural stories and seasons. It gives Guapian and Biluochun as shape-based names and Tieguanyin among cultivar-based names. These are ways names acquired meaning; they are not a test that proves the contents of a packet.

Even a familiar descriptive word can cross category boundaries. The volume’s classification diagram (p. 4) places Junshan Yinzhen under yellow tea and Baihao Yinzhen under white tea. “Silver Needle” alone therefore does not tell you which processing route was used. Likewise, read Lu’an Guapian and Dongting Biluochun as complete product names before interpreting individual characters.

Keep two levels separate when recording a listing: the established name of the tea, and the additional claims about this particular lot. A poetic name does not replace the declared cultivar, actual growing place, harvest date or manufacturing method. A familiar name can help you find the right questions; the seller’s answers still need evidence.

28

Parts of a tea name and how far each can be checked#

Scroll horizontally to see all columns.

PartExampleHow to checkStatus
Producer and licenceSC + 14 digitsPrinted on the pack; province and district digits should match the addressCheckable
Standard and gradeGB/T 18745 特级Grade is valid only against the standard named on the labelSelf-declared
Legal origin武夷山, 云南GI area; producer address and licenceCheckable
Trade tier or site正岩, 牛栏坑, 老班章Producer's own records; output arithmetic; price senseClaim
Cultivar肉桂, 水仙Taste and leaf; defined as product categories in GB/T 18745-2026, but not a compulsory label itemPartly checkable
Plant age古树, 老枞, 大树No legal labelling definition; no leaf testClaim
Process生茶 / 熟茶, 足火Visible in leaf and liquorCheckable by eye and taste
Year and batch2022, 2201批Wrapper, 内票, production date; batch code decodingCheckable for factory tea
Weight357gScaleCheckable
3420210

Sources#

  1. Reporting and journalismaccessed 2026-10-18

    Partly promotional. Its Qidan genetics claim is attributed to Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University; the underlying paper is not identified here.

  2. Standardsaccessed 2026-10-18

    Clauses 4.1.1, 4.1.10 and 4.1.11.4 are represented by a traditional-character transcription. Replaced by GB 7718-2025 from 2027-03-16.

  3. Reporting and journalismaccessed 2026-10-18
Show all sources 28Show fewer sources
  1. Reporting and journalismaccessed 2026-10-18
  2. Reference worksaccessed 2026-10-18
  3. Vendor sourcesaccessed 2026-10-18
  4. Reference worksaccessed 2026-10-20
  5. Reporting and journalismaccessed 2026-10-18
  6. Vendor sourcesaccessed 2026-10-18
  7. Standardsaccessed 2026-10-20

    Official catalogue as of 20 October 2026: published 31 March 2026, with implementation scheduled for 1 April 2027, replacing GB/T 18745-2006. It is not yet in force. The catalogue establishes dates and replacement status, not the wording of individual clauses. The separately listed full-text PDF is hosted by China Food Safety News; it must be distinguished from this official catalogue record.

  8. Reporting and journalismaccessed 2026-10-18
  9. 王镇恒、王广智主编. 中国名茶志. 中国农业出版社, 2000年12月第1版. ISBN 7-109-06510-3 / 9787109065109.
    Books and monographsaccessed 2026-10-20

    Describes tea through the end of the twentieth century. Historical production figures, administrative boundaries and reported tree ages must be read in their original context, rather than as current facts.